Help organising your research by adding bookmarking your articles. You can review your Bookmarks in the Saved area. *
* We take your privacy seriously. Bookmarks and notes are personal to you and are not public.
... the Earl of Harewood and Sir John Weir Hogg, the churchwardens, were communicated with Id and both bodies were exhumed. Mr. Futvoye, solicitor, oi IS John-street, Bedford-row, attended the inquest on the par in of the relatives of the deceased. Evidence ...
... Myers, part ?? v Totterdell-Strevens v Davis-Duston I Ore Company v Nicholls-Claydon v Wootton-Popjoy v Rich-Dethier v Wilson-Futvoye v Balls-Koeber v Austin-Jones v Sewell-Knightley v Sharp. BAXKRUPTCY COURT, BASINGHALL-STREET. [Before Mr. Commissioner EVANS ...
... vOrton, part ?? v 1eitb-Brad- i shaw v Bradshaw--Ward v Talbot. (Before Vice-Chanoellor Sir J. STUART] (Causes, &e.: Kennard v Futvoye, part ?? v El- worthy, part ?? v Street-Furber v Meakin-ILtrri. son r Wardell-MorTaU T Butterfield-Matthcwsv v Chichester- ...
... Myers-Bunn v Totterdell-Strevens v Davis- Duston Iron Company v Nicholls-Claydon v Wooffen- Popjoy v Rich-Dethier v Wilson-Futvoye v Balls- Koeher v Austin-Flicker v Moore, undefended. BANRUUPTCY COURT, BASINGHALL-STREET. [Before Mr. Commissioner EVANS ...
... business as a solicitor. This was his certificate meeting, the petition having been presented so far back as May, 1855. Mr. Futvoye appeared for the assignees; Mr. Chidley supported; Mr. Wilkins opposed for creditors. It was urged in opposition that the ...
... Doffell, psart ?? v DelkIl, further ?? v Lautour-Attorney-Geerail v Arm- .strorng-Colo v Cole-Hlainiltoss v Hamssilton-Nludge v Futvoye- Edwards v Tuck(2). l Chambers, Ato K: HutchinsonivNewark, at ?? v Batley, at lialf-past ?? v Thistle- thwayte, ?? v Gilsingliani ...
... (2)-Jacobs v Jacobs-Penrell v Defell (2)-Barlow v vLau- ?? v Armstrong-Cole v Cole-Hallard v Morgan-Hamilton v Hautilton-Mudge v Futvoye. In Cham- bers: Division A to K : Bushby v Ellis, at eleven-lilgour v Middleton, at ?? v Mourley, at ?? v Jool, at ?? v Wyatt ...
... CHANCERY-LANE, at 10.. By order: Attorney-General v Lord Rivers-etlps v PGilkrson. Causes: Hamilton v flainliltois-Mudge, v Futvoye-Edwards v Tusk-Edwards v Sutton-Attorney-General v ?? v Tibasto-Chanhe v Chance-Woddahl Nixon-North v WSitet In(CBenfbrsd ...
... v The Directors and Guardians of the Poor of St. DI arylebone, to be argued. SHERIFF'S COURT, RED LION.SQUABE.-Ateleven. Futvoye r 1fil-Dodeswell v Wilkins and ?? v Nlcholls-Howard v Thced-Else v Edmonson-Cleal v Cutmore- Wingand and another v Wilkins-Greezi ...
... Williams-JolnsonY Cobb-Re Tyson-Taplin v Johneson-Fano v Cockburn. (Before Master BLrST.) At eleven: White v Bird-Mudge v Futvoye-Simson v Schuster -Allen v Allen-Campbell v Mackintosh, At twelve: Chalmers v M'Leod-Pinckney v Turner. (Before Master Huuruijyv) ...
... (Before Master BLUNTr) i At 4even : Martin v Hadlow-Edwards v Hall. At half-past v eleven: blaldon v Cole. At twelve: Mludge v Futvoye-Dixon v u Pynor. At two: Howard v. Tillett. A (Before Mester BLUST'S CIiEi CmEaS.) r Foley v Smith, at ?? v Bradley, at ? ...
... bankrupt, said that the accounts, which were of a voluminous character, were not yet ready. and asked for an adjournmient. Mr. Futvoye, for the assigaces, concurred. Adjourined accordmingly. IN RV BENNNETT. A petition in bankruptcy vas yesterday opened in tais ...