... LONDON. j TUESDAY, MARCH 3. | | The questions put last night to the Prime Minis- J ter by Lord John Russell in the House of Com- ! tu oris, and the answers they received, have consider- ably disappointed the hopes which the factions I opposed to his Majesty's ...

... ! • present of making up its own mind upon any T i esterday presented no less than two ex- this infirmity of purpose. Lord John was positively to divide the House of 'ti (lie question of bringing up the re- ■ ...

... Ireland were -a only parties prevented from keep- ing arms. The Hon. and earned Member for Dublin told the House last session that he Roman Catholics of Ireland were not only armed, but we I armed ; and why, he wished to »» o w.,should not the Protes ...

... NELL- Was theother surety procured ■»♦!, same way ? •^'■y procured in the Mr. Baker— He was. In reply to questions from Sir John Campbell Mr „ker stated that he had been in the habit of vi,iti„„ Mr. M'Larran and a ways thought the number of his h use was ...

... having been posted (o line the way. to preserve order, so strong was tho public excitement on the question of the motion ol Lord John Russell on the appropriation of the surplus revenues ot the Irish Church to general purposes. The Members began to assemble ...

... Robert Williams, Mr. Bradshaw, Sir Oswald Mosley, Mr. John Neeld, Lord Viscount Sandon, Mr. Hoskins, General Arbuthnot, Lord John Scott, Mr. Thomas Marsland, JVlr. Weyland. DROITWICH. Mr. Roebuck, Lord John Russell, Mr. Chancellor of the Exchequer, Sir James ...