... LAW I TELLIGUNCE-WEDNESDAY. ROLL'8 COURT. gigO V. TRKACt'HN-~gn This was a bill Biedt for the purpese of cha ging the defendants with certain sums which It was alleged ?? bad not invested 0 lroper s5curity, and alo to charge themn with certain adhanceswhF they bad Mngiss The testator in the cause was a Mir. Rteat- ,U a blactkoastb atd large farmer at Chippilg WycoWo .a Alien, ants wft the ...

... Thy PRESEf7' STAI T1ft1,EC-C1ESIASTICI L1 LA V ftfiQ() UN Ti?Y- COURT8,-The lowest in rank aredistinguished l De- I canal, Sab-decanal, Rectorial, &c. &c., sonie with,uandsoulP5 without apl)call, and src ill lumber about three huidtedr The next im order are tile local Dioceian, or Consistorial Conrts. Then the Court of Arches. in tht provinfce of Cnn- terbury, to wlhiich all apleal lies ?? ...

... I a RABBERY AT 11R1. HOWARD'S, JEWELLEI:, I i ~MARKET.STLREET. It will be recollected that some weeks past we statei that the premises of Mr. James Howard, jeweller ((,sm Mr. Mayo's shop), Mlarket-street, had been broken in: duriog the night of the 10th January, and valuable- tl the amount of more than X8t0 stolen therefrom. T.. thieves liad gained admittance from the ledge over 11 Mayos shp ...

... | COURT OF QUEIN'S B3ENcII. DUBLIN, MOINDAY, 8TH rl£B. 3i TT ING i AT N I SI It 1 US A FT ELt T ER n ?? v. Executors of AMP Crinc'ker. Mr. 5I'Doliel , cQ C. and Mr. O'liagan were Cenilsol t;or phiot ff, and Mr. Nalpi r for doefundants. Mir. O'llAGANi OpI'iWd the pleailngs. I1e sta(e1l th at the a tio YI was brough't for use and owcllpaltion *if a errrain firnm of latd in the Chailly of An rin) ...

... DECIDEDLY A GENTLEIMAN.-A gentleman of in- dependent fortune, named Gundry, who occupies chain- hers, A 14, in the Albany, Piccadilly, was on Wednesday brought before Mr Dyer, on a warrant charging him rith assaulting his groom; a second charge was lodged against him of a similar nature by his cook; and a third and much graver charge was preferred against him for assaulting the police ...

... ADMIRALrTY COURT-FOw. 9. r ?? waso Ii tilittintitl dii iret ail ittiotlement tip ?? Ite~ anairtot ;eIr oiauollpe IBrowne. tilhe artietifr-min.tur of Briu Ili' lasen, itt tilia Collttit ifl)f e fur Iiivting ilistttiined ftar iut.,i nulgil. E1 eleh Ott £ Itlo, out hirohmiet desi, 81IMe Oft thu r*ri ~ittggnail Fisheir fittingre (if thue SOeitisi vessrl tile Iler mnie, thlere It incit ti part, ...

... LA IV INTELLIGBNCE-TIL URISDAY. VICE CHANCELLOR'S COURT. itsDE V. XXDXb, Tlin crae was partly heard yesterday, aud concluded to-day. The bill waa tiled by Airs. Eedes against her husband ard the execetors of a till. Porse, who had leit MTs. Eedes a uamt o £400 atock, for the purpose of asserting her right to a sattlenrent out of the legacy. The bill stated that Mirs. Eedea was living separated ...

... I THE COURT. THE PEOPLE. LOOK ON THIS PICTURE, HEr C71RISTNtNN ofthe young Princess took plaso on Wednesday, the 10th inst. Half-past six o'clock was the time fixed. A few minutes after the arrival of the Queen Dowager, her Majesty and the entire ?? room. This saloon, the most magnificent of the state apartments, 'Was pre- pared with great splendour for the christening. 'The throne had been ...

... THE PRESS-GANG AN]) ITS VICTIMS. The Gang has been in fall swing during the past week on various topics, but mnore particularly on the New Poor Law, which is now very ostensibly before the public, and which by all the public who have any intelligence and humanity is detested and denounced. Poverty is now to be more dreaded than crime, and is worse punished. The conse- quence is, that whilst ...

... I ?? DoY. The Lord Chancellor will not atte cond t todaN. VICE.CHANCELLOR'S COURT .L10COLNP8.XNN-S~t t tea, East CNAyfNdELLOart h ?? . Knight. ?? v Eyt r Twyford, parth ford V Rb¢obinOn, editto-Crtlls' Black- Sa'uelditto, byoride-StID for° Winyood further ?? wall RatirWa Company, ditto Jon V -Eades v Eedes. EYLtPt£tt. R 'nOLLS COURT, Ct Wl-iro ye NIchOils'i patent, ?? Stipics- Bown~to ?? ...

... LA -Tis DAY. VIC.-CHANCELLOR'S COUwT, LINCOLN'SwNN-sit at ten. Jones v winwood, part ?? v Eedea-Thornycroft v Crockett. by ?? v Giomals, ?? v Cooper, ?? v Felnue, ?? v rapilton, ?? v Wl'ratilerby-WetalI v Lealie. seren ?? v Weelley, further ?? v Child-Eyle v Caulcutt. ROLLS COURT, CHANCERY.LANESst at tan. conseits and Short Causes. (terteral laller after the Short Callses.-Hol mea v ...

... l AW INTELLIGENCE. , VICE CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Ffl5R5AY, Feb. a. REV. T. SCOTT'S BJOLE.-INJUNCTION,-SEELEY AND OTHERS V. FISHER. Mr. KNoIstsT BrucE said, be was instructed on behalf of Messrs. Seelcy, Hatchards, and others, booksellers, to move ex parte for a special injunction to restrain Messrs. Fisher, the defendants, from selling or disposing of any number or part of an edition of the Rev. ...