... COURT OF CHANCERY-YESTERDAY. Ball v. Ball. The bill in this cause prayed that it might be declared that the sum of 8001. in the hands of the defendants, was bound by the trusts of the marriage settlement of Anna Jane Ball and Edward Ball; that the defendants might be compelled by the decree of the court to bring in a sum of 8001, invest it in proper securities and pay the interest. It also ...

... IMOST EXTRAORDINARY CASE OF UBLI BINGN I, ousFS IN DUBLITN. ' 'the following very curious case came to light yesterday and perhaps in the annals of clever rogues, the hero o the present story has been the most successful during his t career, which is estimated at about 12 calendar months e from the date hereof, and what makes the case more re- t markable is, the fact that these very 1 knowing ...

... COURT OF CHZNCERYSATuaDAYr as Piers v. Piers. Ub Tho Lord Chancellor stated that a reply bad beet re. de ?? flom thb Bishop of Roohester, *ho had been written to on behalf of the plaintiffs, the daughters of the late Sir o John Piers, and claiming ic eum of money under his will, th requesting his attendance in Dublin to give evidence in the D above ease. The queation which came before the ...