Refine Search

Countries

Place

Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland

Access Type

84

Type

84

Public Tags

IMPORTANT MERCANTILE CASE

... :: IM POR.TA'.4NT MERCANTILE CASE. I Yesterday in tle Queen's Bench (Court No I) before the Lord Chief Justice, Mr J3stice Harison ana Ar. Justice Johnson, the arguments werc re- sumned In the case~of Balls aud Son v Mafckhn. ~ It wa! a motion for i new trial of an action brougtI bs' Messrs Balls and Son, North Shields, against Messrs MAacken corn importers, Dublin. to recover £99 IB 4d ...

THE RIGHTS OF VINTNERS

... tra fer of a?irit hce?ee for a houa? 2gb, co?.mty Oavw?,? but whe?i he Ca the cha5rm of the county an? ?? ep?p1?ioz oft o?he ? rilication Vaa'ref?z?ed on t?he groun& the ? number- o# - licensed bouse? u!rea r?bb?hbod- O,?-hc?baif - ~ -l-W -- ~ ?? .~ ?? l~ - I l . ,; I I, - S -b,- *a, wh. MdT ...

LAW INTELLIGENCE

... , T ?? -t . ?? LAW FEMLJ4E1WE Lord Cbiro i4hrd Iusti fl- . iltbon~nd ord Jushpitel Barr.) To. 3D L.ti DWRD Wmnff, TZ&hA ?? tenant. bad not'weee ageistb Aierdro JutliLn Comwrti~eio Ciratc 1a4tevgmf; It washy the i:fh ...

THE GREAT PEARL CASE

... E?4*4 ?R?ESTzOfl?$? OSBO1?E -? S '¾> j ? ?- ? Londos?hUr?1SYo Mr. Osb?raie waa ?rrr.te? ati,9 25 to.nigt?t en 1a?idwg at Do?r froin to 'Centxn?nt. Two daya after? ber denatture frozn? ?nghiid tb#? ?f & WSflant? had heeii eouip1CtSd? ?? I ? was entrusted wiib'?he * exeen- tron, t?ais1sed b e5octtve?1One. ' ...

CUSTODY OF CHILDREN

... C T,- OYF CvJLDRE F ; : V S-; 3 I ; - I EX - 0.TRAORINARP Y 0SOEEi-- I?l -A . ; ' ?? RAYEYARD. ?? ' - -Yesterday in the Queens Bench Divison before ?? .Justice 'Brien,: Mr.Justice Johnson, and' -MrJustice Gibson the case of Rinney, infants came onlortheiringZ - - ' )fr.-f:J H Campbell (instruc-ed by Mr. Huntpr Moore) applied for a wriL af habeas corpusi aiected toe the Rev.Charles Quinn. ...

LAW INTELLIGENCE

... I COUTFSPAL ?? j'v' igz ?? a m . -.t~iaii -.obl aa tnal of -hisa; countepAsTt1nI . n, - . wrasl~ te a~a w d~o~~i .aim eh, Vk l . Qbz'6iiim - pla- l . ii ttti0hoa bifias fn~ed dbid itbw~ai9D: WI35BanUB:-ii w b e-id4d . -,iti -; 1di o C x- l ?? !DiB ?? Ed'T t .i .tii' ' iba ...

ACTION AGAINST A SOLICITOR FOR NEGLIGENCE

... At rIY1ON AGAiNST A-SOLICITO. FoIs N E. - ;Nl .GL1GEWIE. V . I On bitaturnisy in thle Q'ueni's Bench 'Division, be- fore' thE6 Lord Chief Ju-s6ticl, Mr. Justice Johneon, -r Jnstice Hart iSbn, atd Mr.- Justice Holmes, jddgrrint srai givcn in thle case of Mshoznyv Da- ;'oreOn.: a ti::n-L1 moticl. - Thl 'Chief 'JusLice said. this v-cis an aaction affainet ML R'Da-oren, eolicitor, to reeover £70 ...

LAW INTELLIGENCE

... -: JLAW k IN0i4lGM . - : YESTERDAXY.: CHANCERY DIVISION. i (Before the Vic6-Chancellor.) Qg$Jwith whom Niai W jr. Samnuels (inatriCt-b- Messrs Crowlej -Ad Cc), applied on eji A, executors ci the will}of the late Dreid Bpr~ 4cr, an injunction to restriin Mi.rs Catle yron,],3 his wie, and tier agentsU ad srva t pc znr ing ont the binsaef: pubiicanangrocef the preoisesI.O ?? John~-srac, Ciontrf ...

APPEAL BY THE TRAMWAYS COMPANY

... APPEAL BY TRE TRAMWAYS COM- I I I PANY. ni Yeslerdav in the Appeal Court, before the Lord ?? Lord Justice Fitzgibbou, and Lord Justice Barry, a ease was heard of Delany v the I Dublin UniJted Tramway Cormpany. It w.o an ?? by the defendants. the Tramway Company, I 1 against an order of thp Laxchequer 'Division up- I a holding a verdict which the plaintiff had oa- 2 t-ied aairst thce company ...

SPRING ASSIZES

... S~~~R1NG ?? I~ -0 ty fi maccu. t . t Ci-W-t isCMayboroigh, Wednesay Count Tijyir4 Sta Rid' ng, at.- Clornoel, Count Wtte :~tfod t Watefr, Mul Maroh Tb `tlrai. - ?? laU ';Clyo aer=rd .tWteodtsit d ; n ':Dt.blhrc. Sar!1-.ria. C*1 C~iiy6 .ienysae.a sad , ?? aW 1-7t , , 7'7 l>i-t, Eiji; : jb .l - Jttdge ~&~S ingh - ea-- O)r'Ieie EihnesAf . dt1IhtH t Be isace Gibeo ot*6 taraire W Tandt Pimila . ?? ...

ATTACHING AN EDITOR

... -I JUDGE BOYD' AND THE LIA ICME LEADEB. - --E Yesterday ian the Land Judges Ceuri, before Judge Boyd, in I the, case of White's estate, situated in the county of Clare, Mr. Seymour Bushe, on behalf of M7r., M'Eery, editor of the Lneri&c Leader, showed cause against a condition&l' order for* an attach- ment which had been granted on a former day against Mr. M'Enery on account of certain publi ...