JUDGMENTS IN REVIEW-
... JUDGMENTS IN REVIEW- Bethune vs. Burrowes D'Aguiar vs. Eastman Eversley vs. Binns COURTS-SESSIONS AND SITTINGS- Bail Inferior Civil Supreme Criminal Jurisdiction Supreme Civil Jurisdiction Review Supreme Court ...
... JUDGMENTS IN REVIEW- Bethune vs. Burrowes D'Aguiar vs. Eastman Eversley vs. Binns COURTS-SESSIONS AND SITTINGS- Bail Inferior Civil Supreme Criminal Jurisdiction Supreme Civil Jurisdiction Review Supreme Court ...
... REVIEW OF TAXATION. Re ALFRED D'ANDRADE, Ex parte JAMES ANDREW. In this matter Alfred D'Andrade was ordered to pay to the mover, James Andrew, the sum of 02, and costs of his application. This is an appeal from the Taxing Officer's allowance under Appendix ...
... JUDGMENTS IN REVIEW- ...
... (REVIEW OF TAXATION OF COSTS.) THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1905. G R. VAL - 641:1N and JOHN AUGUSTUS RICHARDS. The plaintiff seeks in reality a disallowance of the Bill of Costs of the defendant which has been taxed by the Taxing Officer. Pleadings were ...
... JUDGMENTS IN REVIEW— Kerr ...
... REGISTRAR'S NOTICES. JUDGMENTS IN REVIEW- ...
... REVIEW OF TAXATION. THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1909. Re Estate T. W. CHILCOTT, deceased. This is an application for a review of taxation of costs as far as certain allowed items arc concerned, The objections to items 1,4, 6, 11, 12, 13 and 16 are based ...
... SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH GUIANA. (REVIEW OF TAXATION.) Tars 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 1906. In re petition of JACKSON for leave to appeal, (Review of Taxation of Costs.) In this case a petition for leave to appeal, presented under section 11 of the Magistrate's ...
... Review of refusal of Judge to allow passing of transport, etc. ...
... Oorernme SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH GUIANA. REVIEW OF TAXATION. THIS 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 1907. GOMES, versus RING CHEONG & Co. The plaintiff objects to the amounts allowed on taxation to the witnesses. Headley and Lowe. There is nothing to show what occupation ...
... The facts in this case are practically and the reasons of review precisely the same as those in the preceding case. The decision in the one case was, it was understood, to cover the other. I uphold the Magistrate's decision, without costs. ...
... compel them to review their decision. Secus, if they have refused to hear the application, or if after hearing, have refused it from a mistaken view of their duty amounting to a declining of jurisdiction —The Queen v Fawcett (19 L. J. N. S. 396) ...