... (looting at Joseph Bannister, a watchman, with intent to kill, &c. Mr. Pitcher attended for the prosecution. The i'o rnier evidence as regarded Sandford was recapitulated, and the following evidence was produced against Leslie : — Joseph Bannister, a watchman ...

... him. Catherine Bannister, the wife of Charles Bannister, stated that on the day in question Sneasby, who was in their employ, asked her for the keys of the cellar of the house . ?? 7h! WaS ' e r .? Ut l tene, » p n^- Michael Bannister had had the use ...

... Throgmorton-str., merchant, i 10 J. Peak, New Ormoud-street, bricklayer 3 11 N. Shiers, Aldermanbury, warehouseman 3 II T. Bannister, Norwood-greeu, Hau well, brewer 3 11 J. G. Foster, Lower Pliillimore-place, bill broker 3 11 J. George, London-wall, coach ...

... Our market is completely glutted with every specie* of provision, and several more vessels are daily ex- pected. Capt. Bannister and party, who have penterated from here to King George's Sound, report the country traversed by them in a. most favourable ...

... by order ; heard ; Ho dekin son\% f tVrt\- ?? o^ ** v. Rich, Harrison v. Bryant, Head v. HaddeVk' £r,Z\' Harris. Roger, r. Roger, ; Ashley v TsWe y excw t on iTr7h« directions, and Petition, b, order -. Ph.lh^.V.'Zb Z\ W directions aud costs; S.sson ...

... Walker, W. Willmott, C. Tucker, W. Jordan alias Green, J. A. Keeling, J. L. Lewis, George Blaney, Sarah Prosser, W. Kaye, W. Bannister, J. Plun- kett, W. Wilson, R. Owen, John Day, H. Stevens, John Walker, Patrick Bryan, James Kerr, Mary Anne Taylor. Seven ...

... and others v. Bingham, Chapman v. Crog B e.-3it at hilf-^st nine. SECONDARIES' COURT, BASINGHALL-STBEET Yates v. Serle. Bannister v. Owen, Budduck v. Metherell r^ 11 ?? Ham P ton t, Woodgmte v. Louthan, Martin v. George - ?? ° aU * M * te Ukenatthe 8i ...

... k:nf v ■' ?? .j co .;ts ; Boot v. Harrison, Bannister r. Rogers (2), ••-: •'•■ ' I'-ner*] v. '1-e Corporation of Newbery, Kettle T. Luecna, ' ..:i , ?? ?? Denton [A), further directions and costs ; Bannister v. J i '* c , „ petitions. — BraithwaHo v. ...

... not say with a certainty where the whole ofthe property was taken to. By .Mr. Rogers — Did not hear that any one had lost any property. Mr. Conant here remarked if Mr. Rogers relied on esta- blishing an imputation of carelessness on the part of the police ...

... Floor, Everett v. Crosby, Boddiugtou, clerk, v. Darns, ?? at ten. COURT OF REVIEW, WESTMINSTER. Bankrupt Petitions— Exparte Rogers in re G una, part beard; Ex- liarle Lane in re Bayley; Exparte bnell in re Coulestonc, and cross petition; Exparte Harvey ...

... v. Noble, Da Costa ». Burra, XaisM, Marjoribanks, Lushington t. Sewell, the same r. the same, Thompson v. Grant. Halv v. Bannister. Earl Mountnorris v. Phaire, exparte Treasure, Mai icham v. Case, Forbes v. Shepherd, Pull.i. v. Manning, Attorney.General ...

... VICE-CHANCELLOR KNIGHT RRUCE'S COURT, WEST- MINSTER. Petition b\ Order.— Attorney-General v. Yeovil Corporation Exchequer Causes.— Rogers v. Maule, further directions • Cham- ber* v. Middleton, Pelhain v. Hilder, Thursby v. the same, Plumbe > . Piumbe. Causes ...