Refine Search

More details

Morning Chronicle

LAW NOTICES—THIS DAY

... Myers, part ?? v Totterdell-Strevens v Davis-Duston I Ore Company v Nicholls-Claydon v Wootton-Popjoy v Rich-Dethier v Wilson-Futvoye v Balls-Koeber v Austin-Jones v Sewell-Knightley v Sharp. BAXKRUPTCY COURT, BASINGHALL-STREET. [Before Mr. Commissioner EVANS ...

LAW NOTICES—THIS DAY

... vOrton, part ?? v 1eitb-Brad- i shaw v Bradshaw--Ward v Talbot. (Before Vice-Chanoellor Sir J. STUART] (Causes, &e.: Kennard v Futvoye, part ?? v El- worthy, part ?? v Street-Furber v Meakin-ILtrri. son r Wardell-MorTaU T Butterfield-Matthcwsv v Chichester- ...

LAW NOTICES—THIS DAY

... Myers-Bunn v Totterdell-Strevens v Davis- Duston Iron Company v Nicholls-Claydon v Wooffen- Popjoy v Rich-Dethier v Wilson-Futvoye v Balls- Koeher v Austin-Flicker v Moore, undefended. BANRUUPTCY COURT, BASINGHALL-STREET. [Before Mr. Commissioner EVANS ...

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY—YESTERDAY

... business as a solicitor. This was his certificate meeting, the petition having been presented so far back as May, 1855. Mr. Futvoye appeared for the assignees; Mr. Chidley supported; Mr. Wilkins opposed for creditors. It was urged in opposition that the ...

LAW NOTICES—THIS DAY

... Doffell, psart ?? v DelkIl, further ?? v Lautour-Attorney-Geerail v Arm- .strorng-Colo v Cole-Hlainiltoss v Hamssilton-Nludge v Futvoye- Edwards v Tuck(2). l Chambers, Ato K: HutchinsonivNewark, at ?? v Batley, at lialf-past ?? v Thistle- thwayte, ?? v Gilsingliani ...

LAW NOTICES—THIS DAY

... (2)-Jacobs v Jacobs-Penrell v Defell (2)-Barlow v vLau- ?? v Armstrong-Cole v Cole-Hallard v Morgan-Hamilton v Hautilton-Mudge v Futvoye. In Cham- bers: Division A to K : Bushby v Ellis, at eleven-lilgour v Middleton, at ?? v Mourley, at ?? v Jool, at ?? v Wyatt ...

LAW NOTICES—THIS DAY

... CHANCERY-LANE, at 10.. By order: Attorney-General v Lord Rivers-etlps v PGilkrson. Causes: Hamilton v flainliltois-Mudge, v Futvoye-Edwards v Tusk-Edwards v Sutton-Attorney-General v ?? v Tibasto-Chanhe v Chance-Woddahl Nixon-North v WSitet In(CBenfbrsd ...

LAW NOTICES—THIS DAY

... Williams-JolnsonY Cobb-Re Tyson-Taplin v Johneson-Fano v Cockburn. (Before Master BLrST.) At eleven: White v Bird-Mudge v Futvoye-Simson v Schuster -Allen v Allen-Campbell v Mackintosh, At twelve: Chalmers v M'Leod-Pinckney v Turner. (Before Master Huuruijyv) ...

LAW NOTICES—THIS DAY

... (Before Master BLUNTr) i At 4even : Martin v Hadlow-Edwards v Hall. At half-past v eleven: blaldon v Cole. At twelve: Mludge v Futvoye-Dixon v u Pynor. At two: Howard v. Tillett. A (Before Mester BLUST'S CIiEi CmEaS.) r Foley v Smith, at ?? v Bradley, at ? ...

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY—YESTERDAY

... bankrupt, said that the accounts, which were of a voluminous character, were not yet ready. and asked for an adjournmient. Mr. Futvoye, for the assigaces, concurred. Adjourined accordmingly. IN RV BENNNETT. A petition in bankruptcy vas yesterday opened in tais ...

LAW NOTICES—THIS DAY

... Nulal Company-Joites v Great- ?? v Eden-Godsoin v Turner-Trionusiell v Fell- Waugls v Waddell-Rillick v Smart (two)-Mudge v Futvoye- Targett v Edwards. il Chambers, at eleven : Broadlsurst v Staf- fordshire, &c., Railway-Wood v Sutrr. At half-past eleven: ...

LAW NOTICES—THIS DAY

... Dickson at ci, t ,iel-Grcat North of England Rail- t 0Z ?? ?? v Hawkins, attwelve-Hur- . * t:; t 11 ?? for three : Mudge N, Futvoye. ,l Vice-Chancellor Wigraoms court, t':g ' ir'Y iane Oxford, Reading, and Brighton. ?? 1 ' ttcrs comencing at eleven . Attor- ...